About Me

Name: Mike
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

You Cannot Serve Both God and Mammon

Should the Federal Reserve a syndicate of private bankers control our money supply?

President Abraham Lincoln knew that once private banks started printing up U.S. currency, that the American people would serve money instead of money serving the American people.  President Thomas Jefferson before him opposed a national bank for basically the same reasons.

The Federal Reserve Act signed by the idealist president Woodrow Wilson allows banking interests including Rockefeller, and the British banking interests of J.P. Morgan and Rothschild, to print up our currency and then to collect annual interest from our government.  This is where your income tax goes, to pay the interest on the public debt which would not exist had not Congress abdicated its duty to print currency enumerated in the Constitution.

The argument in favor of private interests printing our currency is that they are disinterested and would therefore help in stabilizing the economy.  But the great economist Milton Friedman himself argued otherwise, that the Federal Reserve neglected their duty causing the great depression after Black Friday in 1929 by neglecting their duty to increase the money supply and therefore increase liquidity.  Why would they have failed to act?  To allow Morgan and his friends to buy up assets after the economic collapse.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christmastime in Connecticut

Over a decade ago, I had the good fortune to study for a year at a small college and seminary in Cromwell, Connecticut about halfway between Hartford and New Haven.  Cromwell was formerly known as the Commons, and there is a grassy area in the town that I believe to be still common ground.  I had been out that way the previous summer with my parents.  We stayed in a hotel in Boston and I happened to be walking past Boston Commons at the same time Senator Kennedy was finishing a particular oration there.  I walked past Senator Kerry and then greeted Senator Kennedy near where he had given the speech.

The college in Cromwell is unique in several respects.  A large mansion once stood atop a hill and was a residence for seminarians before it burned down.  Now, there is a brick dormitory where it once stood so majestically.  The octagonal shaped refectory was once an asylum several storeys high.  Across the street from the refectory are several New England style houses, including one in which the actor Spencer Tracy used to come to dry out, I understand, when he was not out sailing with Katherine Hepburn.  There is also a story that he had been rescued in an old abandoned barn.  I did not know it at the time, but his paternal grandmother's family had settled in the same Midwestern predominantly Irish farming community as my father's ancestors. 

While in attendance there, I once wrote an essay about someone who got stranded in a boat on the way to China.  Little did I know then that I would actually be on a boat adrift off the Pacific coast several years later.  I used to go into town once in a while and noticed a pretty red haired young lady on several occasions outside one of the bank offices.  I can imagine what they were like in colonial times given the colonial architecture of the town.  I declined to go on a trip to New York City to view the Twin Towers, but did go on a trip in the Fall through the Berkshires where I understand the actress Gwyneth Paltrow spent some of her early years, and on through New Hampshire.  On another occasion in the Spring, some of us traveled to Stockbridge, Massachusetts where the painter Norman Rockwell lived, and where there is a beautiful Polish style monastery which every year celebrates the Feast of Divine Mercy.

I had some personal business of which to take care and occasionally drove across Massachusetts to Boston.  I like the old churches in Boston, especially one on the North Side.  Some of my mother's ancestors of the Murphy clan had settled in the Boston and Fall River areas, the first recorded being a wedding in 1836 I believe.  Most of them settled in the Midwest including one female descendant, whose mother is thought to have been a distant cousin of Ireland's Daniel O'Connell, who married an Indiana judge.  Their son became a JAG officer and was married to a Washington D.C. socialite by Bishop Sheen before he became a bishop.  The officer had argued at least one case before the U.S. Supreme Court after the marriage.

On one occasion during the winter I drove south to New Haven and then to the picturesque seaport of Mystic where I stopped to have lunch.   On the way back I could not help thinking of G.K. Chesterton's visits to Connecticut.  I got caught in somewhat of a snowstorm but arrived back safely.

I had planned to stay over the Christmas break.  However, most of my friends went home to family so I arranged for a flight back to Los Angeles.  I wanted to fly out of Hartford, but the tickets were for Logan Airport in Boston.  I spent some time with family.  When I arrived back, I could not start my car in the parking lot at Logan.  I got the battery recharged, but on the way back, it again stalled in Salem, Massachusetts, the site of the Salem witch trials where I got a new battery.

That winter, I also assisted in teaching religious education to a second grade class across the bridge in Glastonbury, Connecticut.  The director of the program was known to be strict, sort of like a school mistress.

The seminary is mostly for "second career" vocations.  They tend to be a bit older than most students but really great guys, and there are some great sisters too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RR

Growing up in a conservative household, my parents like Ronald Reagan switched from Democrat to Republican when Barry Goldwater ran for president in 1964.  Reagan was elected governor about the time I started high school and I thought he should be president even though he was an actor at that time.  During my college days, he answered questions through a video hookup at several California universities at the same time which I got to see live on video.  This was after Watergate and I was in favor of American withdrawal from Viet Nam.  After law school, I went to one campaign rally where Reagan spoke in 1980.  By then I was a Republican.  I was in a car driving when I heard on the radio that President Reagan had been shot.  The rest is history until I went to the dedication of the Reagan Library and again heard Mr. Reagan deliver a speech.  Then I later went back to the library after he died with so many others to pay our last respects.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are Anti-Traditionalists Conservative?

All of us have clay feet.  That is why it is extremely hazardous to put other people on a pedestal.

Russell Kirk, the great American sage of Mecosta, Michigan, wrote in one of his books about how the conservative programme changes as society changes.  Conservatives may be loosely defined as those who uphold a civil order built on tradition or that which was handed down by a nation's forebears.  For example, after the French Revolution, Toqueville traveled to America with his friend Beaumont and wrote about our budding democracy here as contrasted with the chaos of the Reign of Terror in France.  Edmund Burke likewise did everything he could to stem the tide of radical liberalism in Great Britain.  Daniel O'Connell on the other hand, while at first allying himself with the conservative Tories, soon became a liberal Whig so as to promote Irish religious freedom and independence.  But as Kirk also points out,  everyone in the American colonies were actually Whigs, even those who favored remaining within the British commonwealth who were called Tories in name only.  Thus the Whig ideology became the new conservatism of America.

Today we see pundits and writers espousing views that are anti-traditional while allying themselves with conservative politicians and causes.  We see, for example, Michael Medved and Michelle Malkin both defending Keith Ellison in his bid to force Congress, and by extension to force the American people, to administer his ceremonial oath of office using not the Bible of our American tradition, but rather the Koran of Iran's tradition.  While I support Pope Benedict XVI in his heroic efforts to bring reconciliation among Christians and Muslims, I do not agree with the liberal view which would sacrifice one of our cherished traditions which Americans have held since the time of the signing of our Constitution.  Further, these anti-traditionslists have little regard for the First Amendment.  Looking beneath the shallow surface, there is just a touch of jealously in Ms. Malkin's criticism of Gwyneth Paltrow's critique of American culture overseas, as was also the case with regard to one of the Dixie Chicks.

So, we are left with the question, are these anti-traditionalists really conservative, or really liberal?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Paltrow Right About U.S. IQ

Although I do believe Gwyneth Paltrow's claim that she was misquoted or misinterpreted in a Portuguese publication, she does have a point regarding America's lack of intelligence compared with Europe.  American culture is regarded by most of the world, especially Europeans, as being coarse, pushy and overbearing.  Much of this criticism is well founded.  It basically stems from avarice traceable to our immigrant population who substituted materialism for the true spiritual values of our ancestors.

Consider also one of the Dixie Chicks, I can't recall which one, who made statements regarding U.S. foreign policy about the time the Iraq war was reignited in 2003.  First it was what she said; then it was where she said it.  Today, most Americans apparently agree with her views at that time as evidenced by the results of the recent elections.

Hugo Chavez won easily in the Banana Republic of Venezuela, despite working with former Congressman Joseph Kennedy to provide heating oil for needy Americans, while insinuating that President Bush is diabolical.  At the rate we are going academically, America could easily become the next banana republic.  Whatever may be said for our dinner conversations, our educational system is broken, due in no small measure to blundering desegregation measures, quotas, and racial preferences, all in the name of affirmative action.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oaths for Public Officials

AP ran a story picked up by the news section herein regarding the proposed use of the Qur'an by a congressman-elect from Minnesota.  While the legalities may not be in question, it is seriously questionable for our government to be putting on this public photo-op charade all at taxpayers' expense.  Apparently it will be only ceremonial following an official swearing-in en masse without the use of a bible.

To allow the use of the Qur'an in this case would be an affront to the sensibilities of Americans at any time as being contrary to our most cherished traditions, and especially at this time when we are at war against radical Islamic Muslim extremists.   We can probably count on the Democrats,  and their stooges on this side of the aisle,  to once again approve another travesty against what every true American holds dear.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Modesty

Personally, I don't give a hoot about Britney Spears' genitalia (or Paris Hilton's for that matter).  The question we have to ask is not whether or not Britney is a good mom, but rather whether or not Britney's mother was a good mom.

Modesty is a virtue which little girls do not receive at birth.  It takes a lot of practice.  That is not to say that girls of a certain age are not responsible for their own actions.  Girls usually start learning these kinds of things at home, and from their mothers. 

Taking Susan Dey of The Partridge Family at her word, she illustrates the unhappiness caused when parents exploit their children as celebrities and not let them be kids.  Ditto with regard to Jay North, Danny Bonaducci, Michael Jackson, Liberace and countless others. 

Susan has become a good role model for other young women on L.A. Law, and what a role model at that.  I would hope that both Britney and Paris will do the same.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Go Bruins!

I missed the big game because I didn't think the Bruins had much of  a chance.  Not much impressed with the coaching last year.  Found out about the win here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Form of Oath Taking

With regard to federal office, the Constitution requires that an oath be taken by members of Congress but is silent as to its forms.  This does not mean that the winning candidate has the right to choose the form of the oath including whether or not  a bible is used or whether or not another book may be substituted because it "has meaning" to him or her.  And it is definitely not the case contrary to what one retired judge contends, that the person taking the oath has an absolute right with regard to form to such an extent that he or she may take the oath of office on a banana peal.  To say such a thing only trivializes the importance of the oath which assures that the people can legitimately hold the public official accountable at some future date. 

Judges are also required to take oaths.  That is why this retired judge, let's call him Judge So-and-So, wants to trivialize oath taking by making it appear that the law gives the oath taker the right to swear on the koran or on a banana peal.  In reality, the law says no such thing.  This particular judge So-and-So obviously does not want to be held accountable for his past judicial conduct.  He would rather have us all living under sharia, the Islamic system of law inspired by the Koran, so long as he continues to collect his fat pension.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Is Life All About?

Believe me, it's extremely subtle.  Why would a guy (or girl) not want to go for  everything materially that this life has to offer?  Because there is still something missing.  I have reached the highest point intellectually.  I never cared much for the material.  My idea of a good time was spending a week in the High Sierras with friends. 

Perhaps I drink too much.  But that depends on what my life is all about.   Life is so short.  Each of us has to complete a specific purpose or work.  It cannot be all random.   I watch a lot of daytime television.  I can't miss those cool dames on cable, I mean on the news.  Yet, of course that is not reality.   There is always something better out there in real life, and I don't mean in cyberspace.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Swearing on Bible

Michelle Malkin is finally showing her true colors as an anti-traditionalist, something which I suspected all along.  The fallacy in her argument is that although it is true that the Constitution says nothing about any particular holy book, we are nonetheless a Christian nation with Judeo-Christian traditions.  Christianity encompasses all followers of Jesus Christ.  I would hope that Ms. Malkin is one such, although I do not know one way or the other.  The tradition of swearing on the Bible arose in English jurisprudence as a variant of European jurisprudence founded on Roman law as it developed over the centuries in Christian Europe.  It was not necessary to spell out the practice of swearing on the Bible because everyone knew that this is how persons in our culture took oaths in court and prior to holding public office, and our Founding Fathers decided that an oath of some kind should be required prior to taking Congressional office.  It is completely irrelevant whether some presidents affirmed and did not swear.  Tradition is only as good as the culture that upholds it.  The Constitution is only a piece of paper anyway, and is worth nothing the day after it is signed.  Everything depends on the people who are sworn to uphold it, or who agree to abide by its terms.  In other words, it is only a part of tradition, just as swearing on a bible and not on a koran is only a part of tradition.

In fact, swearing on the bible has nothing to do with religion at all.  The courts, like Ms. Malkin, have a complete misunderstanding about separation of Church and State.  The Church began several centuries before certain scriptural writings were declared by church authorities to be canonical as the inspired word of God both of the Old and New Testaments.  Christians are not persons of any particular book, but rather persons of Jesus Christ who is a divine Person.  Dennis Prager has it right.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christkindlmarket

Mayor Daley got it wrong to exclude the producers of  The Nativity Story  from sponsoring the annual Christkindlmarket.  It is fiscally ridiculous.  The City of Chicago would save tax dollars in exchange for modest advertising promoting the theme of the event which is the birth of Christ.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Marriage and Celibacy

Celibacy has been a part of the Christian tradition for a very long time.  St. Paul exhorts his follwers to celibacy, but if they are married to remain so.  But celibacy is a vocation in itself.  It is because that marriage is so awesome for human persons that celibacy is even possible.

Ginger Rogers must have been one of the classiest women of all time.  Yet you would not know from her obscure roles in motion pictures.  Playing opposite Fred Astaire in the beginning days of the talkies, what she was saying is that romance and marriage are beautiful things.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Male BC Pill--Pros and Cons

Here are the pros and cons of the new birth control pill for men developed recently in the UK:

Advantages:


1.  Men no longer have to use condoms.

2.  Safeguards the honor of women.

3.  Fewer unwanted pregnancies.

Disadvantages:

1.  Not 100% effective.

2.  Men who use the pill will be even more impotent than they already are.

3.  Separates the unitive from the procreative dimensions of the conjugal act.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Things

I have to be careful about going to extremes because of a certain genetic predisposition or risk factor.  It's what the AA folks (whom I love) call "rigorous honesty."  Case in point, I once got stuck in a 32' fishing yacht after circling Anacapa Island with just myself and my dog in the boat.  Water was entering where one of the two V-8 engines had broken loose.  Luckily, I could read the radar setting and gave Coast Guard the coordinates.  Then came the repairs and selling the boat in better condition than when I bought it.  I did get a big tax write-off that year.  Such is life.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive