About Me

Name: Mike
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Status Quo? Don't You Guys Want Change?

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

The opposition to the Stupak amendment in Congress and in the Mainstream Media is now being portrayed as an attempt to preserve the status quo of the Hyde Amendment limitations. They conveniently ignore the fact that most Americans oppose government funded abortions, and that an explicit, overt prohibition on abortion funding is necessary in any health care bill to make circumvention of the funding prohibition punishable by law.

These liberals are playing politics with our lives. It is time to force them out of the closet. Do they want abortion funding or not? If not, why are they against putting a ban on funding in the bill? Americans don't care about the status quo. They only want to make sure that tax dollars are not used to pay for abortions, or to subsidize organizations or health care plans that provide abortions whether or not the actual payment for abortions comes out of federal funding.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Right to Health Care in Constitution?

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states or to the people all rights not specifically enumerated. The Constitution gives Congress the express power of the purse. This means that only Congress has authority to decide how tax revenues are spent.

Whether or not required by the Tenth Amendment, prudence following the principle of subsidiarity would dictate that state and local governments should be in charge of health care. The primary responsibility rests with the individual and families. Government has an obligation to assist only where necessary.

Will liberals in Congress derail health care over abortion? Probably not. Sixty votes are only needed in the Senate to overcome a procedural obstacle, not to pass the legislation with or without inclusion of the Stupak amendment or similar pro-life language.

Will the Stupak amendment come back to haunt Senators and Representatives in the years ahead? We can expect a shift in the balance of power after 2010 and possibly a new administration in 2012. This is before health care reform gets off the ground. There is plenty of time to add explicit pro-life language at a later date. The Stupak amendment is at least a noble beginning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RE: African American DNA

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

A few changes are in order from yesterday.

The rate of R1b is much higher in the male Afro-American population, reaching 23% in recent surveys. This reflects a direct paternal lineage from Europe of approximately 30%. Conversely, almost all Afro-Americans descend from Africa in a direct maternal lineage. Using the rational, scientific method with DNA testing, instead of politicizing education and employment as do the liberals, should therefore result in more and better jobs for Afro-Americans, with women not being forced to compete with white men on an intrinsically lopsided playing field.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DNA

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/



As more and more Americans "get tested" to find out their DNA characteristics, it is only a matter of time before someone connects the dots to match the lineages of prominent American families and political figures with their ancient ancestors. Depending on the results, this will do much to dispel the mythology of diversity which has taken over the academic elite.

Not long ago, the current Director of the NEC Lawrence Summers was forced to step down as president of Harvard University because of his off the cuff remarks concerning the apparently intrinsic inability of women to compete in the workplace in many jobs and professions today. This was regarded as academic heresy by the elite who care nothing about objective truth but only about political power. Liberals are using this prestige to gain power through lies. The Danish psychologist Helmut Nyborg, whose research strongly points to gender variance in intelligence, was temporarily suspended and his scientific conclusions were unceremoniously changed by an investigative committee in 2006.

From what little DNA evidence is now available, it is clear that almost all of the male European royalty and nobility are R1b type, including those of Russia as shown by the last Tsar's DNA notwithstanding that R1b is not the most common male DNA form there. Undoubtedly, the same trend will be found to exist in America once the male DNA of the irishtocracy from the Kennedy and Reagan years comes to light.

To recapitulate, diversity is bad for America. Women and minorities would do well to oppose and vote against opportunistic candidates for public office who support diversity in education and in the work place. It is in their own best interest to do so. The role of women needs to be redefined so that they are no longer exploited by the imperative to compete on an intrinsically unequal playing field. Tests should also be done to place males on fast tracks to jobs that are more compatible with their DNA limitations, rather than giving some an artificial advantage to make it possible for them to get jobs for which they have little or no aptitude.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's Have Some Real Health Care Reform

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

The Obamaites in the media continue to repeat the mantra that the Obamacare proposal will not force American taxpayers to pay for abortions. Yet it was the same Obama administration that scuttled the Mexico City Policy so that they could fund abortions abroad with our tax dollars. How can any intelligent American believe that this plan drummed up by Rahm Emanuel will not lead to government coercion to kill the terminally ill and elderly among us? Rahm's brother Ezekiel, chairman of the department of bioethics at the National Institute of Health, has himself made the point that the bill will use a person's age as a basis for denial of health care benefits because older Americans theoretically will have had greater access to health care when they were younger and able to work. Rahm again is only looking out for Israel where abortion is against the law, and he is trying to weaken America so that Israel will not be left out in the cold after decades of dependency on America.

This health care plan amounts to treason by Obama and the liberals in Congress. America cannot wait until the killing of our senior citizens, and citizens with serious disabilities, becomes commonplace. We must act now to bring the traitorous scoundrels to justice. America must act independently in order to promote good in the world. This isn't just about grandma anymore. It is an attack against America.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pundits Blast "You Be the Man" at CPAC Convention

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/
Do only liberal Democrats now have the right to "get down"?

Cable pundits and anchors led by MSNBC's Keith Olbermann mocked Congressional Representative and CPAC moderator Michele Bachman's salutary comments after Michael Steele's address to the convention in DC last week.

Has anyone noticed the liberal trick of portraying sensible patriotic Americans as extremists while at the same time promoting destructive agendas that are off the charts when compared with thousands of years of civilized history?  When was the last time we heard a pundit like Michelle Bernard use some trivial expression in reference of our Secretary of State on a trip overseas, such as the moronic expression "You go girl go!"?  Liberals simply don't get that what they are advocating is total destruction, and is bad for the poor and disadvantaged minorities far more than for the majority.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »