Posted by
Mike on Monday, February 21, 2011 2:01:53 PM
http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/
The importance of uncovering the facts concerning Obama's paternity is
not so much to pinpoint the location of his birth. His status as a
natural born citizen derives from the citizenship of his mother Stanley
Dunham. Even if Barack Obama Sr. born in Kenya and a British subject
was his actual father, his prior marriage in Kenya which was still valid
at the time of the alleged marriage to Miss Dunham in 1961 would only
mean that Obama Sr. was a bigamist making Obama a b@st@rd. Moreover,
there is scant evidence that a marriage even took place, and Michelle
Obama has stated publicly that Obama's mother was "very young and very
single" at the time of his birth. If this was a slip of the tongue, it
was likely that she unintentionally misspoke by revealing a family
secret that was supposed to have remained hushed up.
The real likelihood of Obama's paternity, uncovered by meticulous
investigation, is that his biological father was none other than Frank
Marshall Davis, a low life Communist, pornographer, pedophile and
suspected child molester who lived in the states of Washington and
Hawaii concurrently with the family of Stanley Dunham. This
relationship is further corroborated by a poem entitled "Pops",
apparently written by Davis and plagiarized by Obama for a writing
assignment while he was a student at Occidental College in Los Angeles.
The poem may on one level pertain to a homosexual relationship between
an older male and a younger male. Davis may have been expressing what
happened when he was a child in relationship with his own biological
father, or what he himself did to a younger man, possibly his own
biological son. This explanation fits with scientific studies of how
homosexual pedophilia may be passed down from generation to generation.
In order to properly grasp the Constitutional meaning of natural born
citizenry, it is necessary to momentarily put oneself in the Founding
Fathers' frame of mind. In the late 18th century, the concern was of a
person who owed allegiance to a foreign power possibly being elected to
the highest office in the land and then subordinate the nation's
interests to those of the foreign power. In those days, it was
recognized that the type of allegiance in question derives from the
citizenship of the father, not necessarily the biological forbear. In
the case of a child being born in one of the several states out of
wedlock to an American mother, the presumption is in favor of natural
born citizenship because even if the male forebear was subject of a
foreign power, there would be no allegiance to this power by the child
being illegitimate. Those arguing against natural born citizenship in
this circumstance might try to insert an equal protection argument, that
children should all be treated the same regardless of the circumstances
of their birth, but this argument lacks validity.
Whether or not Obama Sr. actually married Stanley Dunham in Hawaii, the
facts indicate that there was at least a common law marriage and that
Obama Sr. accepted responsibility as Obama's father. This is further
corroborated by the fact that Miss Dunham filed for divorce in Hawaii in
January, 1964 long after Obama Sr. had abandoned the family to attend Harvard
University. But in any event, there could never have been a valid marriage given
the fact of the previous marriage in Kenya being still in effect. So
even if Obama Sr. was the biological forbear of Obama, Obama would still
be a natural born citizen by virtue of his mother's citizenship status.
The real question is whether Obama is electable knowing the possibility
of his being conceived out of wedlock to a seventeen year old white
mother impregnated by a black man nineteen years her senior in Seattle if the American people had
all of the facts about his character and activities?