About Me

Name: Mike
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

9/11 Update (Part III)

http:///www.westernperspective.blogspot.com/

In our last episode, we examined the basis for initiating criminal prosecution against those responsible for tragedies that occurred in 2001 in America, not perpetrated by Muslim terrorists. We concluded with an observation that prosecutors should heed, that the first suspects arrested and brought to trial will be the relatively small fish in the television news media who cooperated with evil, criminal acts by deliberately manipulating audio tapes, film footage and witness accounts to create the impression that the events of 9/11 were solely the work of Arab terrorist hijackers for the purpose of fooling the American people. The evidence of this criminal wrongdoing is widely disseminated on the internet so there is obviously a prima facie case against the TV executives who participated in the cover-up. From there, we can expect some of the accused to turn state's evidence inasmuch as they have already shown themselves to be cowards from the get go. We can also expect that others with knowledge of how the attacks took place will come forward with testimony and other forms of evidence.

Certain explanations put forward make no sense whatsoever. To begin with, the attacks could not have been carried out by Arab hijackers with box cutters because no commercial aircraft was involved in the explosions at the Pentagon and World Trade Center, or the hole in the ground in Pennsylvania on 9/11. We know this because in trying to cover up what really happened, TV video was released purporting to show airplanes at or near the WTC, which are demonstrably fake, other video exists which show no commercial airplanes at the WTC when the first explosions occurred, and there was no credible evidence of debris from airplanes in either the vicinity of the WTC, Pentagon or Shanksville, Pennsylvania after the alleged explosive occurrences.

The scientific evidence simply does not support the government's claim that airplane crashes brought down the Twin Towers or caused Building 7 to collapse at the WTC, or brought about the hole in the Pentagon wall or the hole in the ground in Pennsylvania. Any high school physics student knows that it would have been impossible for the towers to have collapsed in a pancake fashion in a duration only slightly greater than that for an object at free fall traveling the same distance in a vacuum pulled downward by the earth's gravitational force.

In our next update, we will attempt to assist law enforcement, who appear to be overly timid and cowardly, by pointing out some basic initial questions that should be asked in any criminal investigation of arson and murder, these being:

1) Cui bono?

2) Who had the means to carry out the attacks?

3) Who had the opportunity to carry out the attacks?

4) What was the motive for carrying out the attacks?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive