About Me

Name: Mike
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Joe Sobran's Moral Legacy

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

Despite his anti-semitism, Joe Sobran was one hell of a good writer. Oddly, I had read about his joining some sort of Utopian anarchist cult several months ago, but did not get the news of his death until just yesterday.

My recollection comes mostly from his syndicated columns which always took a principled moral stand against the breakdown of societal mores masquerading as libertarianism, particularly his stand against abortion and how that is always tied in with big government abuse.

Sobran was never much of a realist. He believed, for example, that the Southern states had the right to secede from the Union and perpetuate the evil institution known as slavery. He believed, against common sense, that Bacon or de Vere, I'm not sure which, authored the works of William Shakespeare.

This inability to accept life on life's terms led eventually to his getting fired from National Review and his Tolstoyesque final farewell.

Sobran's falling out with Bill Buckley was once again traceable to his inability or stubborn unwillingness to confront and deal with reality. Buckley, the inveterate realist, understood the capitalism system as a means of protecting the "Haves" from the "Have Nots". In tangible terms, this meant protecting the Buckley family oil concessions in Latin America at all costs. Buckley viewed National Review as a means to achieving this end. Writers could be exploited and then discarded as one might jettison a worn out tool. This is the capitalist ethos, and as long as other writers were willing to play the game according to the Buckley rules, they had no right to complain once they were fired.

Joe may have been a much better writer than Buckley, but he, through no fault of his own, was one of the "Have Nots" while Buckley was one of the "Haves". Joe never got that under the rigged regime of capitalist libertarianism, the "Have Nots" have no inherent right to have anything based upon merit or any other rational standard. Anything they do have is at the whim of the "Haves", which is the same result as what would exist under socialism (or state capitalism) which Joe so fiercely struggled against. As alluded to in a prior blog entry herein, if you want "fair", you know where to go.

Joe was a Catholic traditionalist and supporter of the Latin Mass. Final words: Requiem in Pacem.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive